On 8/27/21 6:32 AM, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 01:26:23PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> I'm fine with increasing this policy, but I don't have strong feelings. If we
>>> feel the perlcritic policy change is too much, I would still prefer to go ahead
>>> with the map rewrite part of the patch though.
>> I have no issue either about the rewrite part of the patch, so I'd
>> tend to just do this part and move on. Daniel, would you like to
>> apply that?
> Why the resistance to the perlcritic part? That one case is the only
> violation in the tree today, and it's a pattern we don't want to let
> back in (I will surely object every time I see it when reviewing
> patches), so why not automate it?
>
There doesn't seem to have been much pushback, so let's try it and see.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
