Philip Yarra <philip@utiba.com> writes:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 02:15 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> This would be a pretty short list unless I count wrong! This excludes all
> releases of FreeBSD (and I'm willing to bet other BSDs), Solaris (at least
> the old version I have), OSF, Linux, and who knows what else? MacOS X?
Uhm I stopped reading this thread a while back. Linux has all the reentrant
functions required like strerror_r, getpwnam_r, etc. Why do we think it
wouldn't pass?
> Are these non-threadsafe functions really going to be so heavily-used that we
> can't live with the wrappers? I mean, AFAIK these threading issues are only
> in ECPG and libpq - it's not like re-writing the backend code is required.
It's only libpq and ECPG where thread-safety is at all an issue.
--
greg
