Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gregory Stark
Subject Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268)
Date
Msg-id 87ljuls551.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268)  ("Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268)  ("Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:

> Obviously sandwhiching two values in one column is not going to work.
> The only question here is whether it's important to simultaneously
> support both DAC and MAC.  As far as I can see, KaiGai is the only one
> arguing that we don't need to do that (except for Tom, who doesn't
> like either feature).  If anyone else agrees with his position, now
> would be a good time to speak up.

Well maybe I'm not following. I think it's strange to need two different
row-based security methods. Can you give some examples of how you would use
these two mechanisms together?

--  Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostGIS support!


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: default values for function parameters
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: benchmarking the query planner