[GENERAL] Difference between CAST(v AS t) and v::t - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Lele Gaifax
Subject [GENERAL] Difference between CAST(v AS t) and v::t
Date
Msg-id 87k1yx3vfi.fsf@metapensiero.it
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Difference between CAST(v AS t) and v::t
List pgsql-general
Hi all,

while writing test cases for my SQL pretty printer tool[1], I found what seems
a discrepancy in the "Type Casts" documentation[2]: it states that the two
syntaxes are equivalent, but while
 CREATE TABLE contracts (   ...   company_id uuid NOT NULL,   validity daterange NOT NULL,      EXCLUDE USING gist
(CAST(company_idAS text) WITH =, validity WITH &&) )
 

works, the following
 CREATE TABLE contracts (   ...   company_id uuid NOT NULL,   validity daterange NOT NULL,      EXCLUDE USING gist
(company_id::textWITH =, validity WITH &&) )
 

is rejected with the message "syntax error at or near "::"".

Am I misreading the documentation, or is it missing some special case?

Thanks in advance for any explanation,
ciao, lele.

[1] https://github.com/lelit/pg_query
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-expressions.html#SQL-SYNTAX-TYPE-CASTS
-- 
nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri
real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia.
lele@metapensiero.it  |                 -- Fortunato Depero, 1929.



-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: DrakoRod
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Because PostgreSQL is compiling in old versions of OS?
Next
From: Mark Morgan Lloyd
Date:
Subject: [GENERAL] pg on Debian servers