Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Andrew Gierth
Subject Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time
Date
Msg-id 87k1tignsc.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-committers
>>>>> "Alvaro" == Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:

 Alvaro> Thanks for cleaning that up. I'll look into why the test
 Alvaro> (without this commit) fails with force_parallel_mode=regress
 Alvaro> next week.

Seems clear enough to me - the "Heap Fetches" statistic is kept in the
IndexOnlyScanState node in its own field, not part of ss.ps.instrument,
and is therefore not reported from workers to leader.

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time
Next
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Support index INCLUDE in the AM properties interface.