Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I thought about adjusting it, but I didn't see what it made sense to
> adjust it to. It still is the parameter used for parameter I/O and
> parsing/planning, so the existing text isn't wrong. It will possibly
> also get reused for execution, but the previous statement has a
> lengthy comment on that, so it didn't seem worth recapitulating here.
Ah yes, the previous comment is not far away, so it's easy to read it
that way. Agreed.
> Actually, I did, but the change was in the second patch file attached
> to the same email, which maybe you missed? Combined patch attached.
Oops, I missed it, yes. Looks good to me.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
