>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
Tom> I doubt that we want to decorate every CREATE statement we'veTom> got with an optional MODULE clause; to name just
oneobjection,Tom> it'd probably be impossible to do so without making MODULE aTom> fully reserved word.
Tom> What was discussed in the last go-round was some sort ofTom> state-dependent assignment of a module context. You
couldTom>imagine either[snip]
Tom> or something along the lines of
Tom> SET current_module = modname;
Tom> CREATE this;Tom> CREATE that;Tom> CREATE the_other;
Tom> SET current_module = null;
Tom> which is really more or less the same thing except that it makesTom> the state concrete in the form of an
examinablevariable. InTom> either case you'd need to define how the state would interactTom> with transactions and
errors.
I like the SET version better. As for transactions and errors, I think
that installing a module should be done inside a transaction anyway;
and the usual GUC mechanisms should handle it if it was done using
SET LOCAL, no?
--
Andrew.
