Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Not sure how it is cleaner when we have to have trigger stuff hanging
> around to make one object pretend to be another. That also creates a
> chain of dependency which puts this into the future, rather than now.
Yes, that part isn't cleaner at all. The part where we have a separate
Object to deal with I like better, and I tried to reconciliate the two
view points.
Note that the event trigger would come installed and disabled, the user
would only have to activate it:
ALTER EVENT TRIGGER distribute_my_cluster ENABLE;
Still the same issue.
> The goal is make-sequences-work, not to invent something new that
> might be cooler or more useful. If we create something new, then we
> need to consider the references Daniel described, but that is a whole
> different thing and already accessible if you need/want that.
So ok, I withdraw my consensus proposal. I tried.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
