Re: Speeding up Aggregates - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: Speeding up Aggregates
Date
Msg-id 87ekxm9fjf.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Speeding up Aggregates  (Dror Matalon <dror@zapatec.com>)
Responses Re: Speeding up Aggregates
List pgsql-performance
Dror Matalon <dror@zapatec.com> writes:

> Actually what finally sovled the problem is repeating the
> dtstamp > last_viewed
> in the sub select

That will at least convince the optimizer to use an index range lookup. But it
still will have to scan every record that matches channel==$1, link==$2, and
dtstamp>$3.

The trick of using limit 1 will be faster still as it only has to retrieve a
single record using the index. But you have to be sure to convince it to use
the index and the way to do that is to list exactly the same columns in the
ORDER BY as are in the index definition.

Even if some of the leading columns are redundant because they'll be constant
for all of the records retrieved. The optimizer doesn't know to ignore those.

> > (This is the thing i pointed out previously in
> > <87el6ckrlu.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv> on Feb 13th 2003 on pgsql-general)

--
greg

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Gaetano Mendola
Date:
Subject: Re: Compare rows
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: backup/restore - another area.