On 21.01.22 17:13, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 03:24:02PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 21.01.22 14:51, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>>> Is that change intended? There isn't any usage of the collversionstr before
>>> the possible error when actual_versionstr is missing.
>>
>> I wanted to move it closer to the SysCacheGetAttr() where the "datum" value
>> is obtained. It seemed weird to get the datum, then do other things, then
>> decode the datum.
>
> Oh ok. It won't make much difference performance-wise, so no objection.
I have committed this and will provide follow-up patches in the next few
days.
