It looks to me basically to be a "create table A as select * from B where false".
01.11.2024 20:38:15 Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>:
> On 11/1/24 12:16, thiemo@gelassene-pferde.biz wrote:
>> Thanks, I shall have a look into it. I was under the assumption the the create table like would create no more than
astructural copy.
>
> Not sure what you mean by structural copy, but the table created by CREATE TABLE LIKE will not have any association
withthe table it was created from.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createtable.html
>
> "Unlike INHERITS, the new table and original table are completely decoupled after creation is complete. Changes to
theoriginal table will not be applied to the new table, and it is not possible to include data of the new table in
scansof the original table."
>
>> Torsten Förtsch <tfoertsch123@gmail.com <mailto:tfoertsch123@gmail.com>> escribió:
>> Thiemo,
>>> it looks to me like you are using inheritance just to make sure your SOURCES and TOPO_FILES tables have some common
columns.If you are not actually querying the TEMPLATE_TECH table and expect to see all the rows from the other 2 tables
inthat one table combined, then you could use CREATE TABLE (LIKE ...) instead of inheritance. That way your "child"
tableswould become normal tables and you could use declarative partitioning on them.
>>> Even if you are querying the TEMPLATE_TECH table, you could still do that by turning the TEMPLATE_TECH table into a
viewwhich performs a UNION ALL over the other tables.
>>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
