Re: More char()/ascii() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gregory Stark
Subject Re: More char()/ascii()
Date
Msg-id 878x1fwym8.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: More char()/ascii()  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: More char()/ascii()
List pgsql-hackers
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:

> Gregory Stark wrote:
>> Also, I thought we said this would be an error:
>>
>> postgres=# select length("char"(0));
>>  length --------
>>       0
>> (1 row)
>>
>>   
>
> IIRC, we said chr(0) would give you an error, and it does. I don't recall any
> discussion of "char"(0), but no doubt a few brain cells have died since then.

Ah, that explains my confusion. I knew it seemed weird to have to quote it.

> Fixing it would be trivial, I'm sure, but is it really a problem?

The "char" data type which I was mistakenly using is enough of a wart that it
probably doesn't matter what we do with it. There aren't any security holes
with the current behaviour (I don't think).



--  Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about
EnterpriseDB'sPostgreSQL training!
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Permanent settings
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default