Re: Temporal Table Proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Paul Jungwirth
Subject Re: Temporal Table Proposal
Date
Msg-id 877c5179-d2f6-e222-717f-cc3970ae0d5b@illuminatedcomputing.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Temporal Table Proposal  (Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>)
Responses Re: Temporal Table Proposal  (Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>)
Re: Temporal Table Proposal  (Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2/22/19 11:31 AM, Euler Taveira wrote:
> Em sex, 22 de fev de 2019 às 15:41, Ibrar Ahmed
> <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> escreveu:
>>
>> While working on another PostgreSQL feature, I was thinking that we could use a temporal table in PostgreSQL. Some
existingdatabases offer this. I searched for any discussion on the PostgreSQL mailing list, but could not find any.
Maybemy search wasn’t accurate enough:  if anyone can point me to a discussion, that would be useful.
 
>>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BrenyUb%2BXHzsrPHHR6ELqguxaUPGhOPyVc7NW%2BkRsRpBZuUFQ%40mail.gmail.com
> 
> This is the last one. I don't know why it wasn't in the January CF.

Oh that's by me! :-)

I didn't put it into the CF because I wanted to get some feedback on 
primary keys before I got too far into foreign keys, but someone 
recently advised me to starting adding to CFs anyway with "WIP" in the 
title, so I'll do that next time.

Btw my own patch is very modest, and I'd love to see this other much 
more extensive patch get some attention:


https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAHO0eLYyvuqwF%3D2FsgDn1xOs_NOrFBu9Xh-Wq%2BaWfFy0y6%3DjWQ%40mail.gmail.com#4f7fbace3a2f2ce85fcc161cc3fdd273

They were told to adjust where in the query pipeline they do their work, 
and the latest patch does that (as I understand it), but I don't think 
anyone has looked at it yet.

Both of these patches use range types rather than SQL:2011 PERIODs, but 
I'd like to *also* support PERIODs (and accept ranges everywhere we 
accept PERIODs). Vik Fearing already has a patch to let you *declare* 
PERIODs:

https://www.postgresql-archive.org/Periods-td6022563.html

Actually using PERIODs in queries seems like a decent chunk of work 
though: basically it means making our grammar & processing accept 
PERIODs anywhere they currently accept columns. I'd love to hear some 
thoughts/suggestions around that. For example: a PERIOD is *similar* to 
a GENERATED column, so maybe the work being done there can/should 
influence how we implement them.

I'm excited to be getting some momentum around temporal features though! 
I'm supposed to give a talk about them at PGCon in Ottawa this spring, 
so hopefully that will help too.

Yours,

-- 
Paul              ~{:-)
pj@illuminatedcomputing.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CTE Changes in PostgreSQL 12, can we have a GUC to get old behavior
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: oddity with ALTER ROLE/USER