Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine?
Date
Msg-id 8765uzsuwy.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine?  ("Henrik Steffen" <steffen@city-map.de>)
List pgsql-performance
"Henrik Steffen" <steffen@city-map.de> writes:
> I have many UPDATEs and INSERTs on my log-statistics. For each
> http-request there will be an INSERT into the logfile. And if
> certain customer pages are downloaded there will even be an UPDATE
> in a customer-statistics table causing a hits column to be set to
> hits+1... I didn't think this was a dramatical change so far.

Just to clarify, INSERT does not create dead rows -- tables that have
lots of INSERTS don't need to be vacuumed particularly often. In
contrast, an UPDATE is really a DELETE plus an INSERT, so it *will*
create dead rows.

To get an idea of how many dead tuples there are in a table, try
contrib/pgstattuple (maybe it's only in 7.3's contrib/, not sure).

> Still sure to run VACUUM ANALYZE on these tables so often?

Well, the ANALYZE part is probably rarely needed, as I wouldn't think
the statistical distribution of the data in the table changes very
frequently -- so maybe run a database-wide ANALYZE once per day? But
if a table is updated frequently, VACUUM frequently is definately a
good idea.

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Medi Montaseri
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine?
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: swapping?