Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Date
Msg-id 8762vc1j1m.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> I don't see the point of the sort-by-relpages code. The order the objects
> are dumped should be irrelevant, as long as you obey the restrictions
> dictated by dependencies. Or is it only needed for the multiple-target-dirs
> feature? Frankly I don't see the point of that, so it would be good to cull
> it out at least in this first stage.

From the talk at CHAR(10), and provided memory serves, it's an
optimisation so that you're doing largest file in a process and all the
little file in other processes. In lots of case the total pg_dump
duration is then reduced to about the time to dump the biggest files.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three
Next
From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Date:
Subject: When will 8.1 be EOLed?