>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
Tom> [ I assume you forgot a create type footype here ]
yeah, sorry
Tom> Well, it's not insane on its face. The rowtype of f in theTom> first example is necessarily a built-on-the-fly
record,but inTom> the second case using the properties of the underlying namedTom> composite type is possible, and
consistentwith what happens inTom> 9.3 and earlier. (Not that I'm claiming we were or are totallyTom> consistent ...)
Right, but your changes to the code make it look like there was an
intended change there - with the scan type tupdesc being forced to
RECORD type and its column names changed.
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
