Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
Date
Msg-id 876.1033012701@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> OK, I am back. I think the most promising proposal was from you, Tom:
>     http://candle.pha.pa.us/mhonarc/todo.detail/return/msg00012.html

But that wasn't a specific proposal --- it was more or less an
enumeration of the possibilities.  What are we picking?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)