Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)
Date
Msg-id 916.1033012810@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> ... Now, we just have the GUC value which does
> propogate like the global one did.  Does the postmaster still pass -dX
> down to the child like it used to?

Evidently not; else Patrick wouldn't be complaining that it doesn't
work like it used to.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel