Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
Date
Msg-id 200209260402.g8Q42nO16999@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > OK, I am back. I think the most promising proposal was from you, Tom:
> >     http://candle.pha.pa.us/mhonarc/todo.detail/return/msg00012.html
> 
> But that wasn't a specific proposal --- it was more or less an
> enumeration of the possibilities.  What are we picking?

The rest of my message explains your poposal while clarifying certain
options you gave in the email.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: SSL code fixed