Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Doug McNaught <doug@mcnaught.org> writes:
>> Alex Satrapa <alex@lintelsys.com.au> writes:
>>> 1) Under Linux, if you have the file system containing the WAL mounted
>>> with asynchronous writes, "all bets are off".
>> ...
>> Even with ext2, WAL files are preallocated and PG calls fsync() after
>> writing, so in practice it's not likely to cause problems.
>
> Um. I took the reference to "mounted with async write" to mean a
> soft-mounted NFS filesystem. It does not matter which OS you think is
> the one true OS --- running a database over NFS is the act of someone
> with a death wish. But, yeah, soft-mounted NFS is a particularly
> malevolent variety ...
I took it as a garbled understanding of the "Linux does async metadata
updates" criticism. Which is true for ext2, but was never the
show-stopper some BSD-ers wanted it to be. :)
-Doug
