Re: updated hstore patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Gierth
Subject Re: updated hstore patch
Date
Msg-id 873a6feq2z.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: updated hstore patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: updated hstore patch
List pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> On Sep 21, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Andrew Gierth wrote:>>> I don't think there's any way to do that from the regression
tests.
>> The output that you demonstrated a few messages back should do nicely  >> for delete(), at least:
Tom> Anything involving 'explain verbose' output is not getting into theTom> regression tests.  It's not stable
enough.
Tom> In practice, I don't see why simply testing the result of theTom> function isn't enough for this...

Is delete('...'::hstore,'foo') guaranteed to resolve to the same
function as delete('...'::hstore,$1) where $1 has no type specified?

If so, then the regression tests already cover this.

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: updated hstore patch
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: updated hstore patch