On 10/5/17, 12:29 AM, "Michael Paquier" <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> and a test that exercises a bit of this functionality.
>
> My take on those test would be to not include them. This is a lot just
> to test two logging lines where the relation has been dropped.
Here is a new version of the patch without the tests.
Nathan
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
