Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Specifically, what is ugly about it? Is it that global users have an @
> at the end of their names? How do we prevent namespace collisions
> _without_ doing this? I am all ears.
The folks who are unhappy about this design basically think that the
namespace collisions issue should not be considered a vital requirement;
whereupon you don't have to have the '@' because a search in the
pg_shadow flat file would work well enough.
It comes down to a judgment call about which is uglier, putting '@' on
global usernames or having to avoid namespace collisions.
At this point I think we've wasted more than enough time on the
argument; I haven't seen any new ideas recently, nor any change in
anyone's position. Since no one seems to want to do the work to make a
better implementation, I vote we accept the patch we have and move on.
regards, tom lane
