On 4/5/25 18:46, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not planning to pursue this idea Right Now, but it seems like
> something that could happen for v19 or so. In the meantime I wanted
> to get the ideas down on electrons.
>
> Thoughts?
I generally like the idea because, for now, I need to be sure that no
one touched the parse tree before copying it to do additional
transformations before the optimisation phase.
But what is the way you are proposing here? Do you mean that one more
entity will be explicitly introduced: a transformed parse tree?
It would open an opportunity for extensions to build a set of
alternative transformed trees, pass them through the optimisation phase
and choose the best plan.
--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov
