Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again
Date
Msg-id 8682.1240426138@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> That only works for make check, not make installcheck.

> Configuration affects what can be tested in installcheck, that's quite 
> natural. I would be happy with simply adding an alternative expected 
> output file for min_prepared_xacts=0 case. Like we've done for xml test 
> cases, for example, though that's a compile-time option.

Hmm, that's true; the xml case is a relevant precedent.  This would be
a pretty low-effort way of addressing the problem.  Another nice thing
about it is that we'd stop having a default max_prepared_transactions
value that's completely useless (5 is guaranteed to be either too much
or not enough...)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again