Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jennifer Trey
Subject Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus?
Date
Msg-id 863606ec0903301220o6c0776f6qb97b8dbd3b0b179@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus?  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Responses Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus?
List pgsql-general
Hmm, cant find it.. but.. if I install the regular (not plus), could I later upgrade easily to other versions ? Is that possible? In that case I could just start with the one I already are familiar with.

Jen

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Jennifer Trey <jennifer.trey@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am sorry, but it seems that I replied to only one of you instead of to the
> mailing list.
> I am just about to install a version on my "Server computer" (Windows web
> server 2008 x64) and I am stuck on what I should go with.
> I have been developing on the standard postgreSQL but like that the
> EnterpriseDB webpage claims that "Standard Plus" is faster.

Where does it claim that? Standard Server is pure community
PostgreSQL, with a bunch of extra stuff in the installer.


--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Sam Mason
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENEAL] dynamically changing table
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus?