Re: [GENEAL] dynamically changing table - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Sam Mason
Subject Re: [GENEAL] dynamically changing table
Date
Msg-id 20090330191851.GZ12225@frubble.xen.chris-lamb.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENEAL] dynamically changing table  (A B <gentosaker@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 08:50:59PM +0200, A B wrote:
> Well, the requirement is: keep a lot of data stored, don't loose any
> of it, and you will not know what you will have to store (changing
> number of fields and of different types)

As you've not said anything about getting said data back; it doesn't
seem to matter if it actually gets lost!  Sounds as though the main
unanswered constraint on the database at the moment is what people what
to do with the data once they've handed it to you.  When you've figured
that out you may have a better idea of what to do.

--
  Sam  http://samason.me.uk/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andrej
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENEAL] dynamically changing table
Next
From: Jennifer Trey
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus?