Michael Paquier wrote:
> It looks that I forgot to mark pg_promote as parallel-restricted in
> 1007465 in pg_proc.dat. It seems to me that this is not a huge issue as
> system_views.sql redefines the function for its default values and
> enforces parallel-restricted, but let's be right from the start.
>
> Attached is a patch to fix that. Any comments or objections?
Hmm, I should have noticed that.
I think that the question if pg_promote allows a parallel plan or not
is mostly academic, but the two definitions should be kept in sync.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
