Re: Improper use about DatumGetInt32 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Improper use about DatumGetInt32
Date
Msg-id 859a7b20-9b4c-0add-6704-6fc5ef4ef9e1@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improper use about DatumGetInt32  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: Improper use about DatumGetInt32
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-11-30 16:32, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-Nov-30, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 
>> Patch updated this way.  I agree it's better that way.
> 
> Thanks, LGTM.

For a change like this, do we need to change the C symbol names, so that 
there is no misbehavior if the shared library is not updated at the same 
time as the extension is upgraded in SQL?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Multi Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS - revived patch
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?