Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
> Basically, $subject says it all. It's pretty easy to reproduce:
> delete all the records from a large table and execute any sequentially
> scanning query before autocvacuum comes around and cleans the table
> up; the query will be uncancellable. This can result in fairly
> pathological behavior in i/o constrained systems because the query
> will bog itself down writing out hint bits for minutes or hours
> without any way to cancel or effective i/o throttling (unlike vacuum).
> IMO, this should be backpatched, and is likely fixed by injecting an
> interrupts check at a strategic location. But where? I was thinking
> in heapgetpage() but here are no checks elsehwere in heapam.c which is
> a red flag.
heapgetpage() seems like the most reasonable place to me, as there we'll
only be making the check once per page not once per tuple.
regards, tom lane
