Re: Statement level triggers - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: Statement level triggers
Date
Msg-id 853451f146fadd3f32b195b5d1eab90e@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Statement level triggers  (Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo.romano@notorand.it>)
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> What'd be the behavior of a (plpgsql) trigger function when called as
> a statement level trigger?
> Let's say that a statement will involve more than one row.
> The documentation (v8.4.2, "35.1. Overview of Trigger Behavior") says:
>
> "Statement-level triggers do not currently have any way to examine the
> individual row(s) modied by the statement."

It's not clear what you are asking, but statement-level triggers imply
that the actual data (e.g. row changes) are not relevant (or visible)
to the trigger. Thus, it's more of "something" has changed trigger, rather
than a row-level "this stuff" has changed trigger. For example, Bucardo
uses both kinds: the row-level triggers keep track of what rows have
changed, and statement-level triggers which send a NOTIFY to let the
Bucardo daemon know that the table has changed.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201001200828
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAktXBSAACgkQvJuQZxSWSsj3HwCeN/RhPN/Zo7KmKT9gHafDLLAf
ZEQAn0pkS1sX5jb3+ycQIN6wK0OHxgtC
=V/4j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Statement level triggers
Next
From: Vincenzo Romano
Date:
Subject: Varidic function (printf) not found within a trigger