Issue with functions in Rule - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Hakan Kocaman
Subject Issue with functions in Rule
Date
Msg-id 84AAD313D71B1D4F9EE20E739CC3B6EDB6BA1B@ATLANTIK-CL.intern.digame.de
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Issue with functions in Rule
List pgsql-general
Hello Folks,

first i want to apologize for my bad english :~)
we got here apparntly 2 issues with the above mentioned functionality:

1.    I want to use functions with composite types as parameters,
    which is no deal on our current production server(postgres 7.4.3)
    but don't work on our upcoming production server(8.0.3).
    A sample function is attached.
    The function uses a composite type from a view, which declaration
    is alos attached.
    In this thread it is mentioned as a bug:
    http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-admin/2005-08/msg00153.php
    The question is if it's fixed in 8.0.4 or 8.1.

2.     Using the mentioned function in a rule on the mentioned view
    clashs on the fact, that we don't find a appropriate way for the syntax.
    The rule is also attached.

Also attached is the create statement for the base_table tblprodukte.

I know this looks all very denormalized... hmmm... and in fact it is for reasons
i can't describe in short terms, so please overlook this uglyness.

If anyone got a clue or pointer how this could be done, i would be very thankfull.

Best regards


Hakan Kocaman

Software-Developer
digame.de GmbH
Richard-Byrd-Str. 4-8
50829 Köln

Tel.: +49 (0) 221 59 68 88 31
Fax: +49 (0) 221 59 68 88 98

Email: hakan.kocaman@digame.de


Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: On "multi-master"
Next
From: Gregory Youngblood
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase