Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling
Date
Msg-id 84437ca82810679edc04c0d620158875@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> However, HS is already in the tree, and HS without SR is a whole lot
> less compelling than HS with SR.  So it's going to be pretty
> unsatisfying if we can't get SR in there.

I don't think that's the case. Having HS alone would be a huge win,
and the sooner we can get it out there the better. Those that are
waiting for SR might have to wait one more version, but my intuition
tells me that's a small minority compared to those waiting for HS.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201001071231
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAktGGoMACgkQvJuQZxSWSsj74ACgmjeQgRIAncQiCeQ5aaEeWI3y
UHMAoOFWsCldiRzC0GJygwDdYXLGjE4O
=YAwK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling
Next
From: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Date:
Subject: Re: Testing with concurrent sessions