Re: Testing with concurrent sessions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: Testing with concurrent sessions
Date
Msg-id 3750176155b8e0af30821a3a7194fd88@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Testing with concurrent sessions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> Unless we are prepared to define concurrency testing as something
> separate from the basic regression tests.  Which is kind of annoying but
> perhaps less so than the alternatives.  It certainly seems to me to
> be the kind of thing you wouldn't need to test in order to have
> confidence in a local build.

I thought we were leaning towards something separate.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201001071234
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAktGGxYACgkQvJuQZxSWSsgG0gCfZ4eTpXd/97p3zSJpLqGhKMh6
8nMAoJ2lQUaCWNVeSPDU8fq7VnkO0s4C
=xBOo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Date:
Subject: Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Hot Standy introduced problem with query cancel behavior