Re: Testing with concurrent sessions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Testing with concurrent sessions
Date
Msg-id 27327.1262884790@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Testing with concurrent sessions  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: Testing with concurrent sessions  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Re: Testing with concurrent sessions  ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> On Jan 7, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Right, but to my mind "building from a tarball" needs to include the
>> ability to run the regression tests on what you built.  So injecting
>> Perl into that is moving the goalposts on build requirements.

> In that case, there's nothing for it except concurrent psql.

Unless we are prepared to define concurrency testing as something
separate from the basic regression tests.  Which is kind of annoying but
perhaps less so than the alternatives.  It certainly seems to me to
be the kind of thing you wouldn't need to test in order to have
confidence in a local build.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Testing with concurrent sessions