Tom Lane wrote:
> Do we really want the existence of a function foo(int) to mean
> that you can't create a SQL procedure named
> foo and taking one int argument?
Isn't it pretty much implied by the
ALTER | DROP ROUTINE foo(...)
commands where foo(...) may be either a procedure
or a function? It doesn't look like it could be both.
Best regards,
--
Daniel Vérité
PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org
Twitter: @DanielVerite
