> On 1 Mar 2020, at 20:26, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> In short, I really think we ought to reject this patch and move on.
> Maybe it could be resurrected sometime in the future when we have a
> better handle on when to cache plans and when not.
>
> If you want to press forward with it anyway, certainly the lack of
> any tests in this patch is another big objection. Perhaps you
> could create a pgbench TAP script that exercises the logic.
Based on Tom's review, and that nothing has been submitted since, I've marked
this entry as returned with feedback. Feel to open a new entry if you want to
address Tom's comments and take this further.
cheers ./daniel
