Re: ERROR: missing chunk number 0 for toast value - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Florian Pflug
Subject Re: ERROR: missing chunk number 0 for toast value
Date
Msg-id 839F3B93-9664-4424-B96D-175E164C3E94@phlo.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ERROR: missing chunk number 0 for toast value  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jan7, 2014, at 09:45 , Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
> Overall, I'm leaning towards biting the bullet and always detoasting everything in master. Probably best to just
leavethe stable branches alone. 

+1

The fact that de-TOAST-ing can happen lazily is, at least to me, an
implementation detail that shouldn't be observable. If we want to
allow people to use lazy de-TOAST-ing as an optimization tool, we
should provide an explicit way to do so, e.g. by flagging variables
in pl/pgsql as REFERENCE or something like that.

best regards,
Florian Pflug




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: dynamic shared memory and locks
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Upgrade to Autoconf 2.69