On 09/26/2016 10:45 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 9/26/16 1:39 PM, Jesper Pedersen wrote:
>> Left as is, since BuildTupleFromCStrings() vs. xyzGetDatum() are equally
>> readable in this case. But, I can change the patch if needed.
>
> The point is that to use BuildTupleFromCStrings() you need to convert
> numbers to strings, and then they are converted back. This is not a
> typical way to write row-returning functions.
>
Ok.
Changed:
* BuildTupleFromCStrings -> xyzGetDatum
* 'type' field: char -> text w/ full description
* Removed 'type' information from documentation
Best regards,
Jesper