On 9/9/21, 7:03 PM, "Michael Paquier" <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> As far as the behavior is documented, I'd be fine with the approach to
> keep the code in its simplest shape. I agree that the message is
> confusing, still it is not wrong either as we try to query a run-time
> parameter, but we need the lock.
That seems alright to me.
Nathan
