On 1/11/22 16:22, Thomas Munro wrote:
> 2. headerscheck and cpluspluscheck don't like it, at least
>> not on non-Windows:
>>
>> $ src/tools/pginclude/headerscheck
>> In file included from /tmp/headerscheck.WKh8cz/test.c:2:
>> ./src/include/port/win32ntdll.h:20:10: fatal error: ntstatus.h: No such file or directory
>> #include <ntstatus.h>
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> One way to solve that, perhaps, is to wrap the whole header
>> in #ifdef WIN32. But I think our more usual practice has
>> been to add such headers to the exclusion lists in those
>> two scripts.
> Done.
>
> Those scripts aren't really on my radar... would it be a good idea to
> run them as steps in the CompilerWarnings CI task?
>
>
Or in a buildfarm module (c.f. the perl checks)
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
