Re: libpq_pipeline in tmp_install - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: libpq_pipeline in tmp_install
Date
Msg-id 82fb186d-f336-b981-0ea3-20e1197a0864@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq_pipeline in tmp_install  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 19.05.21 19:35, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
>> On 2021-May-19, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> +1, except that you should add documentation for NO_INSTALL to the
>>> list of definable symbols at the head of pgxs.mk, and to the list
>>> in extend.sgml (compare that for NO_INSTALLCHECK).
> 
>> I propose this.
> 
> WFM.

Thanks for the feedback.  I found that my proposal doesn't quite work, 
because "check" doesn't depend on "all" (anymore; see dbf2ec1a1c0), so 
running make check-world doesn't build the test program first.  The 
easiest workaround I found was to add an "install: all" line even for 
the NO_INSTALL case.  It's all a bit hackish, though.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Assertion failure while streaming toasted data
Next
From: "tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Added schema level support for publication.