On 2024/09/18 23:35, Anton A. Melnikov wrote:
> Fujii, Alexander thanks a lot!
>
> On 17.09.2024 05:47, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> Regarding the patch:
>> if (do_restartpoint)
>> PendingCheckpointerStats.restartpoints_performed++;
>> + else
>> + PendingCheckpointerStats.num_performed++;
>>
>> I expected the counter not to be incremented when a checkpoint is skipped,
>> but in this code, when a checkpoint is skipped, ckpt_performed is set to true,
>> triggering the counter increment. This seems wrong.
>
> Tried to fix it via returning bool value from the CreateCheckPoint()
> similarly to the CreateRestartPoint().
>
> And slightly adjusted the patch so that it could be applied after yours.
Thanks for updating the patch!
-void
+bool
CreateCheckPoint(int flags)
It would be helpful to explain the new return value in the comment
at the top of this function.
- CreateCheckPoint(flags);
- ckpt_performed = true;
+ ckpt_performed = CreateCheckPoint(flags);
This change could result in the next scheduled checkpoint being
triggered in 15 seconds if a checkpoint is skipped, which isn’t
the intended behavior.
-{ oid => '2769',
+{ oid => '6347',
I don't think that the existing functions need to be reassigned new OIDs.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
