Re: tuning our database by increasing shared buffer - Mailing list pgsql-admin
From | Allgood, John |
---|---|
Subject | Re: tuning our database by increasing shared buffer |
Date | |
Msg-id | 82E499DEBAB95F4E91140984379FB1C6710D5D@NOC-ML-09.ohlogistics.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | tuning our database by increasing shared buffer (Barbara Stephenson <barbara@turbocorp.com>) |
List | pgsql-admin |
Hello All
I am working with Barbara on this project and I am curios about what would be a good starting place for setting the max_fsm_relations and max_fsm_pages. Here are the current values max_fsm_pages = 153600 and the max_fsm_relations is set to the default of 1000. I have have read that the output from vacuum can help determine the values. We are using the autovacuum daemon. Is there some logging from that process that could help.
Thanks
John Allgood
Senior Systems Administrator
Turbo, division of OHL
2251 Jesse Jewell Pky. NE
Gainesville, GA 30507
tel: (678) 989-3051 fax: (770) 531-7878
From: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Barbara Stephenson
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:43 PM
To: Tom Lane
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] tuning our database by increasing shared buffer
Thank ypu!
Tom Lane wrote:
Barbara Stephenson <barbara@turbocorp.com> writes:
We will be consolidating from 4 databases to 2 and want to make sure thatthese parameters are the only ones that need changing. Please advise.
Current Future===== =====Max_connection = 50 125Shared_buffers = 16MB 48MB
You will need to make sure that the FSM size parameters are correct for
the combined databases, too.
Shouldn't we increase the max_locks_per_transaction from 64 to 100 or 128since we have more than doubled the # of connections?
No, because the lock table size automatically scales with
max_connections. (Probably max_locks_per_transaction should have been
called max_locks_per_connection ...)
max_prepared_transaction is set at default of 5 which is says if we use it toset it to max_connection.
Are you using prepared transactions at all? If not, I'd actually
recommend setting that to zero to make sure nobody creates a prepared
transaction accidentally. You do *not* want anyone doing PREPARE
TRANSACTION unless there's an XA manager or something in place to make
sure the prepared xact gets committed or rolled back reasonably soon.
regards, tom lane
--
Regards,
Barbara Stephenson
EDI Specialist/Programmer
Turbo, division of OHL
2251 Jesse Jewell Pkwy
Gainesville, GA 30507
tel: (678)989-3020 fax: (404)935-6171
barbara@turbocorp.com
www.ohl.com
______________________________________________________
This e-mail transmission may contain information that is proprietary, privileged and/or confidential and is intended exclusively for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, copying, retention or disclosure by any person other than the intended recipient or the intended recipient's designees is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or their designee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies.
pgsql-admin by date: