* Chris Browne:
>> A dedicated RAID controller with battery-backed cache of ssuficient
>> size and two mirrored disks should not perform that bad, and has the
>> advantage of easy availability.
>
> That won't provide as "souped up" performance as "WAL on SSD," and
> it's from technical people wishing for things that some of those
> things actually emerge...
For WAL (I/O which is mostly sequential), the proposed approach isn't
that bad. You can easily get more than 15,000 write transactions per
second, with a single thread. Good luck finding a SSD NAS with a
60 usec round-trip time. 8->
Something which directly speaks SATA or PCI might offer comparable
performance, but SSD alone isn't sufficient.
--
Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
