Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too
Date
Msg-id 8220.1130963773@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> There is no fseeko in the Windows libraries, nor any provision in the 
> mingw headers that I can see for a 64 bit off_t. So we would need to 
> roll our own to some extent - I think we need more than just a bit of 
> configure cleverness.

> However, there is a Windows library routine to do a 64bit seek and 
> return the file position, so we could fairly easily implement fseeko and 
> ftello based on that. See
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/vclib/html/_crt__lseek.2c_._lseeki64.asp

Is there any risk that the mingw libraries would fail when manipulating
a file whose current offset exceeds 32 bits?  I'm wondering if we'd have
to roll our own stdio in toto, not just fseeko/ftello :-(
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data