Re: Re: [HACKERS] random() function produces wrong range - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: [HACKERS] random() function produces wrong range
Date
Msg-id 8198.965317539@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] random() function produces wrong range  (Roland Roberts <roberts@panix.com>)
Responses Re: random() function produces wrong range  (Christopher Masto <chris@netmonger.net>)
List pgsql-general
Roland Roberts <roberts@panix.com> writes:
> Call random() several times and test the maximum value against your
> thresholds of 2^15 and 2^31.  If random() is generating values in the
> range 1:2^31-1, you would expect half of your values to be greater
> than 2^15-1; more importantly, if you generate, say, 10 values, you
> expect only a 1:1024 chance that they are all below 2^15.

Actually the odds are far better than that.  If the range is 2^31-1
then only about 2^-16th of the outputs should be less than 2^15.
So ten probes gives you a failure probability of about 2^-160 not
2^-10.

Generalizing, you could tell the difference between widths of 31,
47, or 63 bits with the same level of reliability.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Roland Roberts
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] random() function produces wrong range
Next
From: Federico Sevilla III
Date:
Subject: Re: Unions in views