Re: Proposal: http2 wire format - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 26 Mar 2018, at 15:42, Alvaro Hernandez <aht@ongres.com> wrote:

On 26/03/18 13:11, Damir Simunic wrote:

On 26 Mar 2018, at 11:13, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com> wrote:

Damir> * What are the criteria for getting this into the core?

Craig>Mine would be: 

+1

There's a relevant list as well: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/blob/master/backend_protocol_v4_wanted_features.md 

This is a great addition to the list, thanks!

Damir

    Hi Damir.

    I'm interested in the idea. However, way before writing a PoC, IMVHO I'd rather write a detailed document including:

- A brief summary of the main features of HTTP2 and why it might be a good fit for PG (of course there's a lot of doc in the wild about HTTP/2, so just a summary of the main relevant features and an analysis of how it may fit Postgres).

- A more or less thorough description of how every feature in current PostgreSQL protocol would be implemented on HTTP/2.

- Similar to the above, but applied to the v4 TODO feature list.

- A section for connection poolers, as  an auth, as these are very important topics.


    Hope this helps,

    Álvaro
   

-- 

Alvaro Hernandez


-----------
OnGres