On 15.12.21 14:15, Gilles Darold wrote:
> Le 15/12/2021 à 13:41, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
>> On 03.08.21 19:10, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Gilles Darold <gilles@darold.net> writes:
>>>> Sorry I have missed that, but I'm fine with this implemenation so let's
>>>> keep the v6 version of the patch and drop this one.
>>>
>>> Pushed, then. There's still lots of time to tweak the behavior of
>>> course.
>>
>> I have a documentation follow-up to this. It seems that these new
>> functions are almost a de facto standard, whereas the SQL-standard
>> functions are not implemented anywhere. I propose the attached patch
>> to update the subsection in the pattern-matching section to give more
>> detail on this and suggest equivalent functions among these newly
>> added ones. What do you think?
>
>
> I'm in favor to apply your changes to documentation. It is a good thing
> to precise the relation between this implementation of the regex_*
> functions and the SQL stardard.
ok, done
