Re: spgist metapage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: spgist metapage
Date
Msg-id 8137.1337796312@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to spgist metapage  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: spgist metapage
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Since we haven't actually released spgist yet, I'm wondering if it
> should be revised to look more like btree and hash - that is, add a
> 32-bit version number immediately following the magic number.  All
> experience hath shown that it is often much more work to add such
> things later.

With the beta already out, I think we have released it, for some
admittedly-small value of "released".  I think it's too late to make
non-pg_upgrade-able changes on mere speculation that they might be a
good idea.

In any case, I would've expected we'd end up changing all these page
formats if we go over to your concept of a metapage for everything.
Fixing indexes that already have some kind of metapage will surely be
trivial compared to fixing heaps.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Add primary key/unique constraint using prefix columns of an index
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: spgist metapage